Comparing Bufgen and Protoc: Which is the Best Tool for Generating Proto Files?

Photo by Mariusz Magielnicki on Unsplash

Protocol buffers, or “proto files,” are a language- and platform-agnostic data serialization format used for efficient communication of structured data between servers and clients. When working with proto files, it’s often necessary to generate code in various programming languages for use in your application. This is where protoc and bufgen come in.

Both protoc and bufgen are tools for generating code from proto files, but there are some key differences between the two. Let’s take a closer look at the pros and cons of each tool.

Protoc is the official Protocol Buffers compiler and has been around for longer than bufgen. One advantage of protoc is that it is well-established and has widespread support. However, protoc also has some disadvantages. One major drawback is its slower code generation times compared to bufgen, particularly for large proto files. This can be a significant hindrance for developers working on complex projects with many proto files, as slower code generation means longer build times and less efficient workflows.

Bufgen, on the other hand, is a newer, open-source alternative to protoc that has gained popularity due to its superior performance and additional features. One major advantage of bufgen is its speed. In benchmarks, bufgen has consistently demonstrated faster code generation times compared to protoc, making it an excellent choice for developers looking to improve their workflow efficiency.

In addition to its speed, bufgen also offers additional features not found in protoc. One such feature is the ability to specify custom plugins for code generation. This allows developers to customize the code generated from their proto files to better suit their needs. This can be particularly useful for projects that require specialized codegen logic or for adding additional functionality not supported by protoc.

Another advantage of bufgen is its simplicity. Unlike protoc, which requires installation of the Protocol Buffers library and compiler, bufgen is a standalone binary that can be easily downloaded and used without the need for any additional dependencies. This makes it an excellent choice for developers working on projects with strict dependencies or in environments where installing external libraries is not possible.

However, it’s worth noting that bufgen is not without its own drawbacks. One potential downside is that it is a newer tool and not as well-established as protoc. Additionally, bufgen is developed and maintained by the open-source community, which means that it may not have the same level of support and resources as the official Protocol Buffers compiler.

To give an example of the difference between using bufgen and protoc to generate code from a proto file, let’s consider the following simple example:

syntax = "proto3";

message Person {
  string name = 1;
  int32 age = 2;
}

To generate code for this proto file using protoc, we can use the following command:

protoc -I . --python_out=. person.proto

This will generate code for the specified proto file in the current directory. The generated code will include classes for serializing and deserializing the Person message, as well as any additional helper functions and types needed for working with the message.

To generate code for this proto file using bufgen, we can use the following command:

bufgen generate -I . -o . person.proto

This will also generate code for the specified proto file in the current directory, but with the added benefits of faster code generation and the ability to specify custom plugins.

In conclusion, both protoc and bufgen are useful tools for generating code from proto files, but they each have their own unique strengths and weaknesses. Protoc is the official Protocol Buffers compiler and has widespread support, but it may be slower for generating code from large proto files. Bufgen is a faster and more feature-rich alternative, but it is a newer tool with less established support. Ultimately, the choice between protoc and bufgen will depend on the specific needs and requirements of your project.